PDA

View Full Version : RC need help


Trang
13-10-2006, 03:01 PM
Bác nào giải thích câu này giúp em với, em đọc đi đọc lại mà không thể nào hiểu nổi. Hay cái reading skill của em có vấn đề trầm trọng :(

Immigrants’ adoption of English as their primary language is one measure of assimilation into the larger United States society. Generally languages define social groups and provide justification for social structures. Hence, a distinctive language sets a cultural group off from the dominant language group. Throughout United States history this pattern has resulted in one consistent, unhappy consequence, discrimination against members of the cultural minority. Language differences provide both a way to rationalize subordination and a ready means for achieving it.

Traditionally, English has replaced the native language of immigrant groups by the second or third generation. Some characteristics of today’s Spanish-speaking population, however, suggest the possibility of a departure from this historical pattern. Many families retain ties in Latin America and move back and forth between their present and former communities. This “revolving door” phenomenon, along with the high probability of additional immigrants from the south, means that large Spanish-speaking communities are likely to exist in the United States for the indefinite future.

1. It can be inferred from the passage that one of the characteristics of immigrant groups to the United States has traditionally been that, after immigration, relatively few members of the group

(A) became politically active in their new communities

(B) moved back and forth repeatedly between the United States and their former communities

(C) used their native languages in their new communities

(D) suffered discrimination in their new communities at the hands of the cultural majority

(E) sought assimilation into the dominant culture of the new communities they were entering

Em chọn C.
Đáp án là B và được giải thích như sau:
First, why C is not perfect. Read carefully the below lines from para1:

Hence, a distinctive language sets a cultural group off from the dominant language group. Throughout United States history this pattern has resulted in one consistent, unhappy consequence, discrimination against members of the cultural minority.
Hence, the underlined lines clearly imply that it's not true or say a characteristics of immigrants to Not to use their native languages in their new communities. ie. Many of them do use their native languages, but hence face discrimination.

If you are still not convinced, Line1 of para2: "Traditionally, English has replaced the native language of immigrant groups by the second or third generation." state that if X & Y, husband & wife come to live in US from, say India, then they are likely to use their own Native language in US also, but their Children or grand-children will not do that. Hence, Many immigrants Do use their native language.

Now, read the below lines from para2:

Some characteristics of today’s Spanish-speaking population, however, suggest the possibility of a departure from this historical pattern. Many families retain ties in Latin America and move back and forth between their present and former communities.

Here, author mentions an act of some(Few) immigrants as a Departure from Historical Pattern(what Most immigrants are known to follow). ie. Move back & forth from their present(US) & former(original) communities. As this was a Deviation from the Thumb rule, we can say that:

It can be inferred from the passage that one of the characteristics of immigrant groups to the United States has traditionally been that, after immigration, relatively few members of the group moved back and forth repeatedly between the United States and their former communities.

Cái đáp án này em không phục ở chỗ: trong bài đọc, rõ ràng người ta dùng "Many families retain ties in Latin America and move back and forth between their present and former communities", trong câu hỏi, họ hỏi là "relatively few members of the group". Thế thì làm sao mà B được nhỉ. Relatively few mang nghĩa negative là rất ít hoặc gần như không.

Em đau đầu mất ngủ mấy hum vì câu này rùi :p, bác nào vào giúp em cải thiện tình hình với :(

ncmkhoa
13-10-2006, 10:19 PM
câu này anh để Hải giải thích cho em. Tuy nhiên, anh chỉ nhắc nhở em là sau khi đọc xong, em phải tìm hiểu xem mục đích chính của bài này là gì, nó muốn nói lên cái gì. Câu C là câu dụ mình vì nó gần gần nhưng cái đó là mình suy diễn và không phải là ý chính của tác giả.
Anh đọc thấy ý của bài này nói lên sự khó hòa nhập của immigrants vào cộng đồng chung của Mỹ. Thế thì.....

Hqta
15-10-2006, 01:01 PM
Theo em thì đáp án giải thích câu C hoàn toàn ổn. C sure là sai.

Ta thử xem câu B:
Traditionally, English has replaced the native language of immigrant groups by the second or third generation. Đây là historical trend.

Some characteristics of today’s Spanish-speaking population, however, suggest the possibility of a departure from this historical pattern.
Note the phrase: a departure from: ta có thể thấy là việc many families move back and forth between their present (US) and former communities là a departure from a historical trend. Điều đó có nghĩa là trước kia, chưa có hoặc có rất ít "families move back and forth between ...". Nếu trước kia đã có việc đó, thì không có cái historical trend: "English has replaced the native language of immigrant groups by the second or third generation".

That's why B is the best choice.

Just my thought, correct me if I was wrong

solidcolor
08-09-2007, 04:58 PM
http://www.gmatclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30247&highlight=destroy

I found the discussion very helpful. Basically it's what Manhattan said, but it's more "real-life" experience.

luulamhong
28-08-2008, 12:15 AM
Các anh/chị/bạn/em có cách học RC nào hiệu quả không ạ? Nhóm em đang chuyển sang học ôn RC ở nhà nhưng khá vất vả để giải quyết.

Còn đây là một bài đọc RC trong 1000 RC questions, em loay hoay cả sáng nay với bài đọc này mà mãi vẫn không thông suốt được:

Woodrow Wilson was referring to the liberal idea of the economic market when he said that the free enterprise system is the most efficient economic system. Maximum freedom means maximum productiveness; our “openness” is to be the measure of our stability. Fascination with this ideal has made Americans defy the “Old World” categories of settled possessiveness versus unsettling deprivation, the cupidity of retention versus the cupidity of seizure, a “status quo” defended or attacked. The United States, it was believed, had no status quo ante. Our only “station” was the turning of a stationary wheel, spinning faster and faster. We did not base our system on property but opportunity—which meant we based it not on stability but on mobility. The more things changed, that is, the more rapidly the wheel turned, the steadier we would be. The conventional picture of class politics is composed of the Haves, who want a stability to keep what they have, and the Have-Nots, who want a touch of instability and change in which to scramble for the things they have not. But Americans imagined a condition in which speculators, self-makers, runners are always using the new opportunities given by our land. These economic leaders (front-runners) would thus be mainly agents of change. The nonstarters were considered the ones who wanted stability, a strong referee to give them some position in the race, a regulative hand to calm manic speculation; an authority that can call things to a halt, begin things again from compensatorily staggered “starting lines.”

“Reform” in America has been sterile because it can imagine no change except through the extension of this metaphor of a race, wider inclusion of competitors, “a piece of the action,” as it were, for the disenfranchised. There is no attempt to call off the race. Since our only stability is change, America seems not to honor the quiet work that achieves social interdependence and stability. There is, in our legends, no heroism of the office clerk, no stable industrial work force of the people who actually make the system work. There is no pride in being an employee (Wilson asked for a return to the time when everyone was an employer). There has been no boasting about our social workers—they are merely signs of the system’s failure, of opportunity denied or not taken, of things to be eliminated. We have no pride in our growing interdependence, in the fact that our system can serve others, that we are able to help those in need; empty boasts from the past make us ashamed of our present achievements, make us try to forget or deny them, move away from them. There is no honor but in the Wonderland race we must all run, all trying to win, none winning in the end (for there is no end).

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) criticize the inflexibility of American economic mythology
(B) contrast “Old World” and “New World” economic ideologies
(C) challenge the integrity of traditional political leaders
(D) champion those Americans whom the author deems to be neglected
(E) suggest a substitute for the traditional metaphor of a race

2. According to the passage, “Old World” values were based on
(A) ability
(B) property
(C) family connections
(D) guild hierarchies
(E) education

3. In the context of the author’s discussion of regulating change, which of the following could be most probably regarded as a “strong referee” (line 30) in the United States?
(A) A school principal
(B) A political theorist
(C) A federal court judge
(D) A social worker
(E) A government inspector

4. The author sets off the word “Reform” (line 35) with quotation marks in order to
(A) emphasize its departure from the concept of settled possessiveness
(B) show his support for a systematic program of change
(C) underscore the flexibility and even amorphousness of United States society
(D) indicate that the term was one of Wilson’s favorites
(E) assert that reform in the United States has not been fundamental

5. It can be inferred from the passage that the author most probably thinks that giving the disenfranchised “a piece of the action” (line 38) is
(A) a compassionate, if misdirected, legislative measure
(B) an example of Americans’ resistance to profound social change
(C) an innovative program for genuine social reform
(D) a monument to the efforts of industrial reformers
(E) a surprisingly “Old World” remedy for social ills

6. Which of the following metaphors could the author most appropriately use to summarize his own assessment of the American economic system (lines 35-60)?
(A) A windmill
(B) A waterfall
(C) A treadmill
(D) A gyroscope
(E) A bellows

7. It can be inferred from the passage that Woodrow Wilson’s ideas about the economic market
(A) encouraged those who “make the system work” (lines 45-46)
(B) perpetuated traditional legends about America
(C) revealed the prejudices of a man born wealthy
(D) foreshadowed the stock market crash of 1929
(E) began a tradition of presidential proclamations on economics

8. The passage contains information that would answer which of the following questions?
I. What techniques have industrialists used to manipulate a free market?
II. In what ways are “New World” and “Old World” economic policies similar?
III. Has economic policy in the United States tended to reward independent action?
(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) II and III only

9. Which of the following best expresses the author’s main point?
(A) Americans’ pride in their jobs continues to give them stamina today.
(B) The absence of a status quo ante has undermined United States economic structure.
(C) The free enterprise system has been only a useless concept in the United States.
(D) The myth of the American free enterprise system is seriously flawed.
(E) Fascination with the ideal of “openness” has made Americans a progressive people.

:) Cám ơn mọi người trước.

Jolie
28-10-2009, 02:30 AM
Mọi người giúp em câu này với. Em cám ơn trước.
In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters
of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in
Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of
legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is
therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster
illegally that year.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of
catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased
steadily since 1992.
C. Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed
lobster-fishing boats.
D. The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than
9,000 tons.
E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats
went out of business between 1992 and 1996.

Quang
28-10-2009, 03:10 AM
Câu trả lời là A

Premise: the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels
Assumption:The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996
Conclusion:It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year

Bạn Jolie có hai thứ cần làm:
1. Nhờ mod phụ trách box này chuyển câu này sang CR. Câu này là CR chứ không phải RC
2. Khai tên thật trong profile

Mọi người giúp em câu này với. Em cám ơn trước.
In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters
of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in
Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of
legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is
therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster
illegally that year.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of
catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased
steadily since 1992.
C. Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed
lobster-fishing boats.
D. The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than
9,000 tons.
E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats
went out of business between 1992 and 1996.

Jolie
30-10-2009, 02:13 PM
Sorry cả nhà, em làm câu này lúc đêm hôm khuya khoắt buồn ngủ quá nên nhìn nhầm RC thành CR nên post nhầm vào threat này. Anh Quang có thể cho em biết anh/ chị nào là mod của box này để em PM nhờ chuyển với ạ! Tks anh.